lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 09:27:06 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, elicooper@....com,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" 
        <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" 
        <user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: Allow building and running on older hosts

On 05/24/2017 02:03 AM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> 
>> Am 24.05.2017 um 09:01 schrieb Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>:
>>
>> CC'ing Thomas. We is also facing issues with these commits.
>>
>>> Am 24.05.2017 um 03:08 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>>> Commit a78ff1112263 ("um: add extended processor state save/restore
>>> support") and b6024b21fec8 ("um: extend fpstate to _xstate to support
>>> YMM registers") forced the use of the x86 FP _xstate and
>>> PTRACE_GETREGSET/SETREGSET. On older hosts, we would neither be able to
>>> build UML nor run it anymore with these two commits applied because we
>>> don't have definitions for struct _xstate nor these two ptrace requests.
>>>
>>> We can determine at build time which fp context structure to check
>>> against, just like we can keep using the old i387 fp save/restore if
>>> PTRACE_GETRESET/SETREGSET are not defined.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a78ff1112263 ("um: add extended processor state save/restore support")
>>> Fixes: b6024b21fec8 ("um: extend fpstate to _xstate to support YMM registers")
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>> arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c       |  4 ++++
>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c b/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
>>> index 00f54a91bb4b..502bd642e5c2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
>>> @@ -26,13 +26,14 @@ int save_i387_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
>>>
>>> int save_fp_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
>>> {
>>> -    struct iovec iov;
>>> -
>>>    if (have_xstate_support) {
>>> +#ifdef PTRACE_GETREGSET
>>> +        struct iovec iov;
> 
> Is this okay, in C90? Won't this give an error once the thing is defined?

I did not get such a warning to be generated, but arguably I am using a
fairly hold host/compiler (GCC 4.4) let me try on something newer as well.

> 
>>>        iov.iov_base = fp_regs;
>>>        iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct _xstate);
>>>        if (ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, pid, NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov) < 0)
>>>            return -errno;
>>> +#endif
>>>        return 0;
>>>    } else {
>>>        return save_i387_registers(pid, fp_regs);
>>> @@ -48,13 +49,15 @@ int restore_i387_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
>>>
>>> int restore_fp_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
>>> {
>>> -    struct iovec iov;
>>> -
>>>    if (have_xstate_support) {
>>> +#ifdef PTRACE_SETREGSET
>>> +        struct iovec iov;
>>> +
>>>        iov.iov_base = fp_regs;
>>>        iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct _xstate);
>>>        if (ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, pid, NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov) < 0)
>>>            return -errno;
>>> +#endif
>>>        return 0;
>>>    } else {
>>>        return restore_i387_registers(pid, fp_regs);
>>> @@ -127,8 +130,10 @@ void arch_init_registers(int pid)
>>>
>>>    iov.iov_base = &fp_regs;
>>>    iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct _xstate);
>>> +#ifdef PTRACE_GETREGSET
>>>    if (ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, pid, NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov) == 0)
>>>        have_xstate_support = 1;
> 
> So why keep have_xstate_support when all branches that test for it are now pre compiler conditionals?

To minimize the amount of lines needed to account for lack of
PTRACE_SETREGSET/GETREGSET, and to keep the if(0) else() semi-explicit here.

Would you prefer that instead:

diff --git a/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
b/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
index 00f54a91bb4b..b342bbfbb8d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
+++ b/arch/x86/um/os-Linux/registers.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ int save_i387_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)

 int save_fp_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
 {
+#ifdef PTRACE_GETREGSET
        struct iovec iov;

        if (have_xstate_support) {
@@ -34,9 +35,9 @@ int save_fp_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
                if (ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, pid, NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov) < 0)
                        return -errno;
                return 0;
-       } else {
+       } else
+#endif
                return save_i387_registers(pid, fp_regs);
-       }
 }

 int restore_i387_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ int restore_i387_registers(int pid, unsigned long
*fp_regs)

 int restore_fp_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
 {
+#ifdef PTRACE_SETREGSET
        struct iovec iov;

        if (have_xstate_support) {
@@ -56,9 +58,9 @@ int restore_fp_registers(int pid, unsigned long *fp_regs)
                if (ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, pid, NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov) < 0)
                        return -errno;
                return 0;
-       } else {
+       } else
+#endif
                return restore_i387_registers(pid, fp_regs);
-       }
 }

 #ifdef __i386__

> 
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c b/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c
>>> index cb3c22370cf5..8af0fb5d2780 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c
>>> @@ -50,7 +50,11 @@ void foo(void)
>>>    DEFINE(HOST_GS, GS);
>>>    DEFINE(HOST_ORIG_AX, ORIG_EAX);
>>> #else
>>> +#if defined(PTRACE_GETREGSET) && defined(PTRACE_SETREGSET)
>>>    DEFINE(HOST_FP_SIZE, sizeof(struct _xstate) / sizeof(unsigned long));
>>> +#else
>>> +    DEFINE(HOST_FP_SIZE, sizeof(struct _fpstate) / sizeof(unsigned long));
>>> +#endif
>>>    DEFINE_LONGS(HOST_BX, RBX);
>>>    DEFINE_LONGS(HOST_CX, RCX);
>>>    DEFINE_LONGS(HOST_DI, RDI);
>>>


-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists