[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGOxZ53-NrSzGUJ-Fk1fx+3jqESK1wHTwerT6PuYY_nb3DQ0Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 22:09:19 +0530
From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: samsung: Split per ARMv7/v8 arch
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There will not be a shared image between ARMv7 and ARMv8 so there is no need to
> combine all of this into one driver.
>
> Splitting the data allows to make it more granular (e.g. code related to
> ARMv8 Exynos is self-contained), slightly speed up the compilation and
> reduce the effective size of compiled kernel.
>
> Diff of second patch is not nice... but it is the best I created.
> Experimenting with -B and -M resulted in detection of copy/rename but end
> diff was 60% bigger in lines of patch.
>
> Tests on ARMv8 would be much appreciated.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (2):
> pinctrl: samsung: Add include guard to local header
> pinctrl: samsung: Split Exynos drivers per ARMv7 and ARMv8
>
Patch: 2/2 was not applying cleanly on 4.12-rc1. Sorry if I am missing
any dependent patches.
Anyway with a minor conflict fix for 4.12-rc1, I am able to test this
series on exynos7 espresso board.
Looks good to me.
Feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
As this works on exynos7, tested SD/eMMC card detection which depends
on pinctrl configs. So
Tested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c | 815 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c | 399 ++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 1163 +-----------------------
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.h | 13 +
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 8 +-
> 7 files changed, 1250 insertions(+), 1160 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos-arm64.c
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Regards,
Alim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists