[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <225381e1-5ad6-7208-697d-73cbb56163cc@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 18:56:14 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: brgerst@...il.com, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
dvlasenk@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
bp@...en8.de, luto@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86/timers: Add simple udelay calibration
On 2017-03-21 13:19, tip-bot for Lu Baolu wrote:
> Commit-ID: dd759d93f4dd4fd2f345a78ad1223bb3edf3ee7b
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/dd759d93f4dd4fd2f345a78ad1223bb3edf3ee7b
> Author: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:01:29 +0800
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:28:45 +0100
>
> x86/timers: Add simple udelay calibration
>
> Add a simple udelay calibration in x86 architecture-specific
> boot-time initializations. This will get a workable estimate
> for loops_per_jiffy. Hence, udelay() could be used after this
> initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1490083293-3792-2-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 4bf0c89..e70204e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -837,6 +837,26 @@ dump_kernel_offset(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long v, void *p)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void __init simple_udelay_calibration(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int tsc_khz, cpu_khz;
> + unsigned long lpj;
> +
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
> + return;
> +
> + cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
> + tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
> +
> + tsc_khz = tsc_khz ? : cpu_khz;
> + if (!tsc_khz)
> + return;
> +
> + lpj = tsc_khz * 1000;
> + do_div(lpj, HZ);
> + loops_per_jiffy = lpj;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Determine if we were loaded by an EFI loader. If so, then we have also been
> * passed the efi memmap, systab, etc., so we should use these data structures
> @@ -985,6 +1005,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> */
> x86_configure_nx();
>
> + simple_udelay_calibration();
> +
> parse_early_param();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>
Can we move this past init_hypervisor_platform()? Otherwise, the
x86_platform hooks aren't fully initialized yet, and we may use the
wrong functions.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists