lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 21:03:08 -0700
From:   Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
        Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] thermal: cpu_cooling: improve interaction with
 cpufreq core

Viresh,

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:23:52AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-05-17, 19:41, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:57:07PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Hi Guys,
> > > 
> > > The cpu_cooling driver is designed to use CPU frequency scaling to avoid
> > > high thermal states for a platform. But it wasn't glued really well with
> > > cpufreq core. For example clipped-cpus is copied from the policy
> > > structure and its much better to use the policy->cpus (or related_cpus)
> > > fields directly as they may have got updated. Not that things were
> > > broken before this series, but they can be optimized a bit more.
> > > 
> > > This series tries to improve interactions between cpufreq core and
> > > cpu_cooling driver and does some fixes/cleanups to the cpu_cooling
> > > driver.
> > > 
> > > I have tested it on ARM 32 (exynos) and 64 bit (hikey) boards (haven't
> > > tested the power specific bits).
> > > 
> > > Lukasz from ARM has been very generous in testing and finding out few
> > > bugs in the earlier versions and getting those fixed.  He has
> > > successfully tested the new version on his ARM big LITTLE Juno board.
> > > 
> > > Pushed here as well:
> > > 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git thermal/cooling
> > > 
> > > V3->V4:
> > 
> > 
> > Took this version into my -linus branch for the next merge window.
> > Including the patch to remove the checkpatch warning. But please send
> > an extra patch to fix the style pointed on patch 8.
> 
> Thanks Eduardo.
> 
> But I am not sure what's left there to be fixed :(
> 
> There were two warnings with patch 8, s/kmalloc/kmalloc_array and line
> over 80 columns and both were fixed by the patch I sent separately.

You are right, you are done here. This was probably a bug in my script
showing old checkpatch results on patch 8, somehow.

Sorry for the noise.

> 
> -- 
> viresh

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ