[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170524210124.058072b6@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:01:24 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>,
knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wens@...e.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: sun4i-gpadc-iio: fix parent device being
used in devm function
On Sun, 21 May 2017 21:06:32 +0200
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 08:36:07AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > For the sake of DT binding stability, this IIO driver is a child of an
> > MFD driver for Allwinner A10, A13 and A31 because there already exists a
> > DT binding for this IP. The MFD driver has a DT node but the IIO driver
> > does not.
> >
> > The IIO device registers the temperature sensor in the thermal framework
> > using the DT node of the parent, the MFD device, so the thermal
> > framework could match the phandle to the MFD device in the DT and the
> > struct device used to register in the thermal framework.
> >
> > devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register was previously used to register the
> > thermal sensor with the parent struct device of the IIO device,
> > representing the MFD device. By doing so, we registered actually the
> > parent in the devm routine and not the actual IIO device.
> >
> > This lead to the devm unregister function not being called when the IIO
> > module driver is removed. It resulted in the thermal framework still
> > polling the get_temp function of the IIO module while the device doesn't
> > exist anymore, thus generated a kernel panic.
> >
> > Use the non-devm function instead and do the unregister manually in the
> > remove function.
> >
> > Fixes: d1caa9905538 ("iio: adc: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>
> > Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Thanks. I'm afraid this has gone into a non rebasing tree
(and upstream for that matter) so I can't now apply this.
We will have to fall back on the email record.
Thanks
Jonathan
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists