[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1705241400510.49680@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 14:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: [patch] compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused static inline
functions
GCC explicitly does not warn for unused static inline functions for
-Wunused-function. The manual states:
Warn whenever a static function is declared but not defined or
a non-inline static function is unused.
Clang does warn for static inline functions that are unused.
It turns out that suppressing the warnings avoids potentially complex
#ifdef directives, which also reduces LOC.
Supress the warning for clang.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
--- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
@@ -15,3 +15,10 @@
* with any version that can compile the kernel
*/
#define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
+
+/*
+ * GCC does not warn about unused static inline functions for
+ * -Wunused-function. This turns out to avoid the need for complex #ifdef
+ * directives. Suppress the warning in clang as well.
+ */
+#define inline inline __attribute__((unused))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists