linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] regulator: tps65917: Add support for SMPS12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <98063d56-b5e7-09dd-2524-0bd83306166e@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 09:05:25 +0530
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <t-kristo@...com>,
        <tony@...mide.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <afd@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] regulator: tps65917: Add support for SMPS12



On Wednesday 24 May 2017 10:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:46:56PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> App support for SMPS12 dual phase regulator.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> What's the relationship between this and support for the lp87565?

Nothing related. I should have sent this separately. Should i send a v3
separately?

>