lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a861a25y.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 16:19:53 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Michael Bringmann <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ib>,
        Shailendra Singh <shailendras@...dia.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/2]: powerpc/hotplug/mm: Fix hot-add memory node assoc

Michael Bringmann <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> On 05/24/2017 06:19 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Michael Bringmann <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>>> With or without 3af229f2071f, we would still need to add something, somewhere to add new
>>> bits to the 'node_possible_map'.  That is not being done.
>> 
>> You mustn't add bits to the possible map after boot.
>> 
>> That's its purpose, to tell you what nodes could ever *possibly* exist.
>
> The problem that I have been encountering is that the 'possible map' did *not*
> show all of the possible nodes.

OK so how did that happen?

The commit message for 3af229f2071f says:

    In practice, we never see a system with 256 NUMA nodes, and in fact, we
    do not support node hotplug on power in the first place, so the nodes
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    that are online when we come up are the nodes that will be present for
    the lifetime of this kernel.

Is that no longer true?

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ