[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170525120236.GD386@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 21:02:36 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] printk: add __printf attributes to internal
functions
On (05/25/17 13:29), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2017-05-24 07:49:50, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> > When compiling with -Wsuggest-attribute=format, gcc complains that some
> > functions in kernel/printk/printk_safe.c transmit their argument to
> > printf-like functions without having a printf attribute. Silence these
> > warnings by adding relevant __printf attributes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
> > Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> > ---
> > v2: add __printf attribute to the definition of vprintk_nmi() which is
> > used when CONFIG_PRINTK_NMI is not defined.
>
> Sergey, I believe that that your Reviewed-by is still valid even after
> this small update. Is that true, please?
sure. sorry about that!
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists