linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 10/10] ARC: [plat-eznps] Handle memory error as an exception

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB5PR05MB1638AFD967BFE03E278E320AAAFF0@DB5PR05MB1638.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 12:03:45 +0000
From:   Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
To:     Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Elad Kanfi <eladkan@...lanox.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/10] ARC: [plat-eznps] Handle memory error as an
 exception

>From: Alexey Brodkin [mailto:Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 14:31 PM
...
>> > Why don't you just make simulator behaving exactly as your real chip?
>> I can't change simulator core behavior. nSIM is a Synopsys proprietary code.

>Well probably it worth discussing with nSIM team if they may have any suggestions on how to align nSIM behavior with your real HW?
We already talked with them, nothing we can do at this point.
What about turning mem_service into weak symbol and have my own platform copy (just like we do with res_service)?

-Noam