linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] linux/bug.h: correct formatting of block comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <xa1td1axhwbh.fsf@mina86.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 15:58:58 +0200
From:   Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To:     Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
        Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] linux/bug.h: correct formatting of block comment

On Thu, May 25 2017, Ian Abbott wrote:
> Correct these checkpatch.pl warnings:
>
> |WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
> |#34: FILE: include/linux/bug.h:34:
> |+/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a
> |+   result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used
>
> |WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
> |#36: FILE: include/linux/bug.h:36:
> |+   aren't permitted). */
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>

Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>

> ---
> v5: Actually, there was no v1 thru v4.  I called this v5 to match the
> series.
> ---
>  include/linux/bug.h | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h
> index 687b557fc5eb..ca24007e2dc3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bug.h
> @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ struct pt_regs;
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n)			\
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0))
>  
> -/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a
> -   result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used
> -   e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions
> -   aren't permitted). */
> +/*
> + * Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a
> + * result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used
> + * e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions
> + * aren't permitted).
> + */
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); }))
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); }))

-- 
Best regards
ミハウ “𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪86” ナザレヴイツ
«If at first you don’t succeed, give up skydiving»