[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1495730933.29207.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 09:48:53 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused static
inline functions
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 09:14 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> clang doesn't raise
> warnings about unused static inline functions in headers.
Is any "#include" file a "header" to clang or only "*.h" files?
For instance:
The kernel has ~500 .c files that other .c files #include.
Are unused inline functions in those .c files reported?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists