linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mailbox: fix completion order for blocking requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABb+yY36v=m4GVTyAumZXjuZBtreVzBZjXHXWq=8JaHaS48wAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 23:04:56 +0530
From:   Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:     Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>
Cc:     Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: fix completion order for blocking requests

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:

>
> Sorry for delay -- this is not my main activity so please be patient.
>
No problem.

>> >
>> > Along with this patch you still need at least one patch from Sudeep with subject:
>> > "[PATCH 1/3] mailbox: always wait in mbox_send_message for blocking Tx mode"
>> >
>> Yes. Just so we are on same page, can you please redo your tests and
>> see if this and Sudeep's patch-1/3 does the trick?
>
> Yes, for such kind of behaviour to make things work I need to apply Sudeep's patches
> and this your (or mine) patch that changes completion behaviour.
> Or do I miss something and have you already applied it?
>
I have already applied three patches from Sudeep. The patch in this
thread is not yet applied, I was hoping to get some tested-by, though
I think it is OK.

Thanks