[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170525211833-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 21:22:01 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Piotr Gregor <piotrgregor@...ncme.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankede@...dia.com>,
Vlad Tsyrklevich <vlad@...rklevich.net>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Move test of INTx masking to pci_setup_device
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 07:13:23PM +0100, Piotr Gregor wrote:
> The test for INTx masking via config space command performed
> in pci_intx_mask_supported should be performed before PCI device
> can be used. This is to avoid reading/writing of PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE
> register which may collide with MSI/MSI-X interrupts.
>
> This patch simplifies test performed in pci_intx_mask_supported
> and introduces intx_mask_support field in struct pci_dev to store
> the result. The test itself is moved to pci_setup_device.
> The result can be queried at any time later from the pci_dev with
>
> static inline bool pci_is_intx_mask_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> /*
> * INTx masking is supported if device passed INTx test
> * and it's INTx masking feature works properly.
> */
> return (pdev->intx_mask_support && !pdev->broken_intx_masking);
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Gregor <piotrgregor@...ncme.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
> drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c | 2 +-
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pci.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index b01bd5b..bcaab9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3709,42 +3709,46 @@ void pci_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_intx);
>
> /**
> - * pci_intx_mask_supported - probe for INTx masking support
> + * pci_intx_mask_supported - probe for INTx masking support in pci_setup_device
> * @dev: the PCI device to operate on
> *
> - * Check if the device dev support INTx masking via the config space
> - * command word.
> + * Check if the device dev supports INTx masking via the config space
> + * command word. Executed when PCI device is setup. Result is saved
> + * in intx_mask_support field of pci_dev and should be checked
> + * with pci_is_intx_mask_supported() after PCI device has been setup
> + * to avoid reading/writing of PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE register.
> */
> bool pci_intx_mask_supported(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> - bool mask_supported = false;
> - u16 orig, new;
> + u16 orig, toggle, new;
>
> + /*
> + * If device doesn't support this feature though it could pass the test.
> + */
> if (dev->broken_intx_masking)
> return false;
>
> pci_cfg_access_lock(dev);
>
> + /*
> + * Perform the test.
> + */
> pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &orig);
> - pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND,
> - orig ^ PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE);
> + toggle = orig ^ PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE;
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, toggle);
> pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &new);
>
> /*
> - * There's no way to protect against hardware bugs or detect them
> - * reliably, but as long as we know what the value should be, let's
> - * go ahead and check it.
> + * Restore initial state.
> */
> - if ((new ^ orig) & ~PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE) {
> - dev_err(&dev->dev, "Command register changed from 0x%x to 0x%x: driver or hardware bug?\n",
> - orig, new);
> - } else if ((new ^ orig) & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE) {
> - mask_supported = true;
> - pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, orig);
> - }
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, orig);
>
> pci_cfg_access_unlock(dev);
> - return mask_supported;
> +
> + if (new == toggle)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_intx_mask_supported);
>
> @@ -3798,7 +3802,7 @@ static bool pci_check_and_set_intx_mask(struct pci_dev *dev, bool mask)
> * @dev: the PCI device to operate on
> *
> * Check if the device dev has its INTx line asserted, mask it and
> - * return true in that case. False is returned if not interrupt was
> + * return true in that case. False is returned if no interrupt was
> * pending.
> */
> bool pci_check_and_mask_intx(struct pci_dev *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 19c8950..16c60ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1399,6 +1399,9 @@ int pci_setup_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> }
>
> + if (pci_intx_mask_supported(dev))
> + dev->intx_mask_support = 1;
> +
> switch (dev->hdr_type) { /* header type */
> case PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL: /* standard header */
> if (class == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI)
> diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c b/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c
> index d0b508b..8cd443c 100644
> --- a/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static int probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - if (!pci_intx_mask_supported(pdev)) {
> + if (!pci_is_intx_mask_supported(pdev)) {
> err = -ENODEV;
> goto err_verify;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index 324c52e..933456e 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> vdev->nointx = true;
> pci_intx(pdev, 0);
> } else
> - vdev->pci_2_3 = pci_intx_mask_supported(pdev);
> + vdev->pci_2_3 = pci_is_intx_mask_supported(pdev);
> }
>
> pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 33c2b0b..0fbd278 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
> unsigned int __aer_firmware_first_valid:1;
> unsigned int __aer_firmware_first:1;
> unsigned int broken_intx_masking:1;
> + unsigned int intx_mask_support:1; /* INTx masking is supported */
> unsigned int io_window_1k:1; /* Intel P2P bridge 1K I/O windows */
> unsigned int irq_managed:1;
> unsigned int has_secondary_link:1;
> @@ -1003,6 +1004,15 @@ int __must_check pci_reenable_device(struct pci_dev *);
> int __must_check pcim_enable_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> void pcim_pin_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>
> +static inline bool pci_is_intx_mask_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + /*
> + * INTx masking is supported if device passed INTx test and it's INTx
> + * masking feature works properly.
> + */
> + return (pdev->intx_mask_support && !pdev->broken_intx_masking);
> +}
> +
And now there's pci_is_intx_mask_supported and pci_intx_mask_supported
which are the same except pci_intx_mask_supported shouldn't be called by
anyone except in one place in pci code.
Pls don't do this. Rename pci_intx_mask_supported -> __pci_intx_mask_supported
and then everyone can just keep calling pci_intx_mask_supported as previously,
except it'll be faster and safer. And unexport
__pci_intx_mask_supported.
> static inline int pci_is_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> return (atomic_read(&pdev->enable_cnt) > 0);
> --
> 2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists