[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+LUVWf3PHitRAeWzBivr5eFF_8cTexeLfQwYo-uH98Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 12:35:54 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 1vier1@....de,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] ipc: Drop non-RCU allocation
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Manfred Spraul
<manfred@...orfullife.com> wrote:
> The only users of ipc_alloc() were ipc_rcu_alloc() and the on-heap
> sem_io fall-back memory. Better to just open-code these to make things
> easier to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> [manfred@...orfullife.com: Rediff due to inclusion of memset() into
> ipc_rcu_alloc().]
Oh! I see, the hunk snuck into this patch, rather that patch 3.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists