[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170525200931.GA12733@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 14:09:31 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Do not run tpm2_shutdown
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:04:24PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 11:50 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:12:36AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>The tpm2_shutdown does not work with the VTPM proxy driver since the
> >>function only gets called when the backend file descriptor is already
> >>closed and at this point no data can be sent anymore. A proper shutdown
> >>would have to be initated by a user space application, such as a container
> >>management stack, that sends the command via the character device before
> >>terminating the TPM emulator.
> >>
> >>To avoid the tpm2_shutdown we introduce a TPM_CHIP_FLAG_NO_SHUTDOWN flag
> >>that only the VTPM proxy driver sets. This also avoids misleading kernel
> >>log messages.
> >This seems strange to me..
> >
> >Why isn't ops null if the fd has gone away?
> >
> >What is the call flow that hits this?
>
> In this function here.
>
> static void tpm_del_char_device(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> cdev_device_del(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
>
> /* Make the chip unavailable. */
> mutex_lock(&idr_lock);
> idr_replace(&dev_nums_idr, NULL, chip->dev_num);
> mutex_unlock(&idr_lock);
>
> /* Make the driver uncallable. */
> down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM2_SU_CLEAR);
> chip->ops = NULL;
> up_write(&chip->ops_sem);
> }
>
> The request cannot be deliver because the anonymous fd has been closed
> already.
The driver must always be able to process requests until
tpm_del_char_device completes, so this is triggering an existing bug
in vtpm. This change in core behvior is not going to fix the bug.
eg a request from sysfs/etc could come in between vtpm fd closure and
tpm_del_char_device, and it still must be handled properly.
I guess you need to have transmit command fail fast once the fd is
closed.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists