linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/88] rcu: Make synchronize_rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1495749601-21574-42-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 14:59:15 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/88] rcu: Make synchronize_rcu_mult() check for duplicates

Currently, doing synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu) might
(or might not) wait for two RCU grace periods.  One approach is
of course "don't do that!", but in CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernels,
synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_sched) does exactly that.
This results in an ugly #ifdef in sched_cpu_deactivate().

This commit therefore makes __wait_rcu_gp() check for duplicates,
which in turn allows duplicates to be passed to synchronize_rcu_mult()
without risk of waiting twice on the same type of grace period.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/update.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index 82a5aa10dbc5..123a9c4b5055 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
 		   struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array)
 {
 	int i;
+	int j;
 
 	/* Initialize and register callbacks for each flavor specified. */
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
@@ -390,7 +391,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
 		}
 		init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs_array[i].head);
 		init_completion(&rs_array[i].completion);
-		(crcu_array[i])(&rs_array[i].head, wakeme_after_rcu);
+		for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
+			if (crcu_array[j] == crcu_array[i])
+				break;
+		if (j == i)
+			(crcu_array[i])(&rs_array[i].head, wakeme_after_rcu);
 	}
 
 	/* Wait for all callbacks to be invoked. */
@@ -399,7 +404,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
 		    (crcu_array[i] == call_rcu ||
 		     crcu_array[i] == call_rcu_bh))
 			continue;
-		wait_for_completion(&rs_array[i].completion);
+		for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
+			if (crcu_array[j] == crcu_array[i])
+				break;
+		if (j == i)
+			wait_for_completion(&rs_array[i].completion);
 		destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs_array[i].head);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.5.2