[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6WW4V=iYvaGFzhdUsQz9CsFad90yB-71HeP3gqYm08FVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 15:43:13 -0700
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: "Li, Yi" <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: atull@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, rafal@...ecki.pl,
Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable no_cache flag to driver_data
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Li, Yi <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> This patch is for "disabling the cache" for streaming and iwlwifi case,
> adding the test to verify the cache function should be a separate patch,
> right? I can look more into the cache part.
How can we know cache was disabled without first testing what having
cache enabled could be like ?
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists