[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170526133504.GD24144@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 06:35:04 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1, RFC 0/8] Boot-time switching between 4- and 5-level
paging
> Even ignoring all of above, I don't see much benefit of having per-mm
> switching. It adds complexity without much benefit -- saving few lines of
> logic during early boot doesn't look as huge win to me.
Also giving kthreads a different VM would prevent lazy VM switching
when switching from/to idle, which can be quite important for performance
when doing fast IO.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists