[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VecHUoxP2cYv3chTmJL=ok5_TMUMirdcH8pmcJEgdSFdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 13:52:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, priyalee.kushwaha@...el.com,
souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] intel_telemetry_debugfs: fix oops found while
load/unload module test
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:17:39AM -0700, priyalee.kushwaha@...el.com wrote:
>> +Rafael, Len, Pavel, linux-pm: Is there a preferred approach for dealing with
>> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP?
>
> Yeah, empty "unregister_pm_notifier" in !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP case sounds
> like a good idea.
I like the idea, though I would let Rafael to speak up.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists