[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vdory-NsFRo5OFv7+G5dF315Yr10kEoVsgzod5mwMgqhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 16:48:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] gpio-exar/8250-exar: Make set of exported GPIOs configurable
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> On the SIMATIC, IOT2040 only a single pin is exportable as GPIO, the
> rest is required to operate the UART. To allow modeling this case,
> expand the platform device data structure to specify a (consecutive) pin
> subset for exporting by the gpio-exar driver.
> + unsigned int first_pin;
> + if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "first_pin", &first_pin) < 0 ||
And again, we need to follow the rules of the device property
bindings. (No underscores - use dashes; name should be registered).
Without Rafael's / Mika's and Rob's opinions I would not go with a
such name even for internal property.
DWC3 (USB) for example is still using "linux," prefix. I dunno if it's
the case here, I mean can or can't we use similar approach.
> + device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "npins", &npins) < 0)
"ngpios"
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists