[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdmMwEvho-2tRoYz3CGz2QvLr40G6Nf7wQ76LCtxFjT4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 23:49:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Fix printing info about WDG structure
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
>> wrote:
>> Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do
>>
>> pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id);
>>
>> instead?
>>
>> For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be
>> done.
>
> Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE?
To me it looks slightly cleaner.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists