[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3296473.EV6dOggqEx@phil>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 00:19:26 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
dianders@...omium.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add iomux-route switching support
Hi David,
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2017, 15:20:19 CEST schrieb David Wu:
> The rk3228, rk3328, rk3399 have an interesting new feature,
> some things like one specific uart can use multiple pins to
> output data, but control of that seems to be split. The actual
> pin config is identical for all pins - each needs to be configured
> to function 2.
>
> Use one pin of a specifc group to be set to its special pinmux function,
> then configure the corresponding routing bits. If the pinmux setting is
> wrong for that pin the ip block won't work correctly anyway.
the approach looks nice now, the whole series
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Thanks
Heiko
> David Wu (4):
> pinctrl: rockchip: Add iomux-route switching support
> pinctrl: rockchip: Add iomux-route switching support for rk3228
> pinctrl: rockchip: Add iomux-route switching support for rk3328
> pinctrl: rockchip: Add iomux-route switching support for rk3399
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 321 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 320 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists