[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170528191619.GA20159@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 21:16:19 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
"Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>,
Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] power: supply: bq27xxx: Correct supply status with
current draw
Hi!
> The status reported directly by the battery controller is not always
> reliable and should be corrected based on the current draw information.
>
> This implements such a correction with a dedicated function, called
> when retrieving the supply status.
>
> @@ -1182,6 +1196,8 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_status(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di,
> else
> status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
> } else {
> + curr = (int)((s16)curr) * 1000;
Umm.
> @@ -1190,6 +1206,18 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_status(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di,
> status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
> }
>
> +
> + if (curr == 0 && status != POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING)
> + status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL;
> +
> + if (status == POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL) {
> + /* Drawing or providing current when full */
> + if (curr > 0)
> + status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
> + else if (curr < 0)
> + status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
> + }
Are you sure this works? On N900, we normally see small currents to/from "full" battery.
Should the test be for absolute_value(curr) < something rather than for == 0?
What hw did you test it on?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists