[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170528085147.dazpglz4my6o7isg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 10:51:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [x86/mm] e2a7dcce31: kernel_BUG_at_arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:31 AM, kernel test robot
> <xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> >
> > commit: e2a7dcce31f10bd7471b4245a6d1f2de344e7adf ("x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git x86/tlbflush_cleanup
>
> Ugh, there's an unpleasant interaction between this patch and
> intel_idle. I suspect that the intel_idle code in question is either
> wrong or pointless, but I want to investigate further. Ingo, can you
> hold off on applying this patch?
Yeah, will wait for the next iteration of your series.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists