[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbZj4ktsSY2XcVnPb=O=UJMQWunHRj2BuCr9zEXtNVPyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:19:09 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Jagadish Krishnamoorthy <jagadish.krishnamoorthy@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] gpio: acpi: Synchronize acpi_find_gpio() and acpi_gpio_count()
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> If we pass connection ID to the both functions and at the same time
> acpi_can_fallback_to_crs() returns false we will get different results,
> i.e. the number of GPIO resources returned by acpi_gpio_count() might be
> not correct.
>
> Fix this by calling acpi_can_fallback_to_crs() in acpi_gpio_count()
> before trying to fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists