[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5A-31iC5NrGePZCcgsNNwpvURq4LpztQai4GaWRrJXbmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:01:27 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] *** SPI Slave mode support ***
Hi Jiada,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com> wrote:
> BUT if you think the use case don't need to be supported from SPI core,
> then I don't have objection either, I will only submit imx SPI slave support
> patch,
> after your SPI slave support patch set been applied
Geert's SPI slave series has been applied.
Do you still plan to send imx spi slave support on top of it?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists