[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1496060062.28981.15.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:14:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Amir Levy <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
Jared.Dominguez@...l.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/27] thunderbolt: Allow passing NULL to
tb_ctl_free()
On Sun, 2017-05-28 at 11:13 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 06:41:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > Following the usual pattern used in many places, we allow passing
> > > NULL
> > > pointer to tb_ctl_free(). Then the user can call the function
> > > regardless
> > > if it has allocated control channel or not making the code bit
> > > simpler.
> > >
> >
> > +Suggested-by as you mentioned in cover letter?
>
> OK, I'll add it.
>
> BTW, should I do it for the other patch that was suggested by Andreas
> as
> well?
Sure
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists