[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1496042420.21582.3.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:20:20 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhiyuan.lv@...el.com,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, zhi.a.wang@...el.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] vfio: Define vfio based vgpu's dma-buf operations
> +struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info {
> + __u32 argsz;
> + __u32 flags;
> + struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
> + __s32 fd;
> + __u32 pad;
> +};
Hmm, now you have argsz and flags twice in vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info ...
I think we should have something like this:
struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info {
__u64 start;
__u64 drm_format_mod;
__u32 drm_format;
__u32 width;
__u32 height;
__u32 stride;
__u32 size;
__u32 x_pos;
__u32 y_pos;
__u32 padding;
};
struct vfio_vgpu_query_plane {
__u32 argsz;
__u32 flags;
struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
__u32 plane_id;
__u32 padding;
};
struct vfio_vgpu_create_dmabuf {
__u32 argsz;
__u32 flags;
struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info plane_info;
__u32 plane_id;
__s32 fd;
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists