linux-kernel - [tip:x86/urgent] x86/microcode/AMD: Change load_microcode_amd()'s param to bool to fix preemptibility bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-dac6ca243c4c49a9ca7507d3d66140ebfac8b04b@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 May 2017 01:16:06 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...e.de,
        hpa@...or.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/microcode/AMD: Change load_microcode_amd()'s
 param to bool to fix preemptibility bug

Commit-ID:  dac6ca243c4c49a9ca7507d3d66140ebfac8b04b
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/dac6ca243c4c49a9ca7507d3d66140ebfac8b04b
Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
AuthorDate: Sun, 28 May 2017 22:04:14 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 29 May 2017 08:22:48 +0200

x86/microcode/AMD: Change load_microcode_amd()'s param to bool to fix preemptibility bug

With CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled, I get:

  BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
  caller is debug_smp_processor_id
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc2+ #2
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack
   check_preemption_disabled
   debug_smp_processor_id
   save_microcode_in_initrd_amd
   ? microcode_init
   save_microcode_in_initrd
   ...

because, well, it says it above, we're using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible code.

But passing the CPU number is not really needed. It is only used to
determine whether we're on the BSP, and, if so, to save the microcode
patch for early loading.

 [ We don't absolutely need to do it on the BSP but we do that
   customarily there. ]

Instead, convert that function parameter to a boolean which denotes
whether the patch should be saved or not, thereby avoiding the use of
smp_processor_id() in preemptible code.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170528200414.31305-1-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index 45db4d2..e9f4d76 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ void load_ucode_amd_ap(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax)
 }
 
 static enum ucode_state
-load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size);
+load_microcode_amd(bool save, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size);
 
 int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax)
 {
@@ -338,8 +338,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax)
 	if (!desc.mc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ret = load_microcode_amd(smp_processor_id(), x86_family(cpuid_1_eax),
-				 desc.data, desc.size);
+	ret = load_microcode_amd(true, x86_family(cpuid_1_eax), desc.data, desc.size);
 	if (ret != UCODE_OK)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -675,7 +674,7 @@ static enum ucode_state __load_microcode_amd(u8 family, const u8 *data,
 }
 
 static enum ucode_state
-load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
+load_microcode_amd(bool save, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
 {
 	enum ucode_state ret;
 
@@ -689,8 +688,8 @@ load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 	/* save BSP's matching patch for early load */
-	if (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) {
-		struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(cpu);
+	if (save) {
+		struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(0);
 		if (p) {
 			memset(amd_ucode_patch, 0, PATCH_MAX_SIZE);
 			memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, ksize(p->data),
@@ -722,11 +721,12 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_amd(int cpu, struct device *device,
 {
 	char fw_name[36] = "amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin";
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+	bool bsp = c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
 	enum ucode_state ret = UCODE_NFOUND;
 	const struct firmware *fw;
 
 	/* reload ucode container only on the boot cpu */
-	if (!refresh_fw || c->cpu_index != boot_cpu_data.cpu_index)
+	if (!refresh_fw || !bsp)
 		return UCODE_OK;
 
 	if (c->x86 >= 0x15)
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_amd(int cpu, struct device *device,
 		goto fw_release;
 	}
 
-	ret = load_microcode_amd(cpu, c->x86, fw->data, fw->size);
+	ret = load_microcode_amd(bsp, c->x86, fw->data, fw->size);
 
  fw_release:
 	release_firmware(fw);