[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <41a7b947-579f-e9ba-188d-699e7ff0b27d@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:59:10 -0700
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] thermal: max77620: fix device-node reference
imbalance
On 05/30/2017 09:25 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The thermal child device reuses the parent MFD-device device-tree node
> when registering a thermal zone, but did not take a reference to the
> node.
>
> This leads to a reference imbalance, and potential use-after-free, when
> the node reference is dropped by the platform-bus device destructor
> (once for the child and later again for the parent).
>
> Fix this by dropping any reference already held to a device-tree node
> and getting a reference to the parent's node which will be balanced on
> reprobe or on platform-device release, whichever comes first.
>
> Note that simply clearing the of_node pointer on probe errors and on
> driver unbind would not allow the use of device-managed resources as
> specifically thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister() claims that a valid
> device-tree node pointer is needed during deregistration (even if it
> currently does not seem to use it).
>
> Fixes: ec4664b3fd6d ("thermal: max77620: Add thermal driver for reporting junction temp")
> Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.9
> Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c
> index e9a1fe342760..71d35f3c9215 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/max77620_thermal.c
> @@ -104,8 +104,6 @@ static int max77620_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - pdev->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
> -
> mtherm->dev = &pdev->dev;
> mtherm->rmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
> if (!mtherm->rmap) {
> @@ -113,6 +111,14 @@ static int max77620_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Drop any current reference to a device-tree node and get a
> + * reference to the parent's node which will be balanced on reprobe or
> + * on platform-device release.
> + */
> + of_node_put(pdev->dev.of_node);
> + pdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
> +
This seems like needless churn. Can't this just be squashed into patch #7?
-Tyrel
> mtherm->tz_device = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, 0,
> mtherm, &max77620_thermal_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(mtherm->tz_device)) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists