lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170530233237.GA39733@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 16:32:38 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dianders@...omium.org,
        tfiga@...omium.org, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Check irq disabled & masked states in
 irq_shutdown

Sorry to respond to myself. Thomas, your reply to another mail in this
series helped me to notice:

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 04:19:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Side note: for issues like the first problem above, I wonder why there
> isn't a flag that once could pass to request_irq() that suggests the IRQ
> should be initially disabled?

Is that what IRQ_NOAUTOEN is for?

> I know this wouldn't work for shared
> interrupts (but request_irq() could reject that combination, no?)

Hehe, but then I see this, for example, when grepping around:

drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c:

        irq_set_status_flags(omap->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
        ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, omap->irq, dwc3_omap_interrupt,
                                        dwc3_omap_interrupt_thread, IRQF_SHARED,
                                        "dwc3-omap", omap);

IIUC, that's quite broken, no?

Brian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ