[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170530092137.2b6890be@bbrezillon>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:21:37 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nand tree with the jc_docs tree
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 30 May 2017 11:37:23 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nand tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>
> between commit:
>
> b6f6c29454d2 ("mtd: adjust kernel-docs to avoid Sphinx/kerneldoc warnings")
>
> from the jc_docs tree and commit:
>
> c79d63fd272c ("mtd: nand: Remove support for block locking/unlocking")
>
> from the nand tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter just removed the code modified by the former,
> so I did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
> far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
I just dropped commit c79d63fd272c from my nand/next branch. I'll queue
it for the next release.
Thanks,
Boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists