lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:41:40 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>, Sherman Yin <syin@...adcom.com>, bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: bcm: clean up modular vs. non-modular distinctions On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com> wrote: > It is a simple ask to place the new information in a new comment after the > legal header. OK send a patch fixing the headers the way you want them. I don't mind if you want a certain order on your desk as a figure of speak, I am the same. > An aim at consistency helps reduce confusion (internal and external) > of what license header template to apply to files. Modifying these headers > and placing > information in the middle of them does not help in this effort. Aha, I understand it if a human is reading the files. If it is a machine, not so much, as we should not serve the machines but the other way around. Yours, Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists