linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170530112213.40e7bdb4@free-electrons.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 11:22:13 +0200
From:   Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>,
        Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU

Hello,

On Tue, 30 May 2017 11:16:12 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> This commit modifies the Marvell EBU Armada 7K and 8K Device Tree files
> to describe the ICU and GICP units, and use ICU interrupts for all
> devices in the CP110 blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>

Please disregard this patch. I should remember all patches before using
"git format-patch", this would avoid me sending stale versions of
patches.

Basically the other PATCH 6/6 is exactly the same, with just the title
changed (and is the more correct one).

Sorry about that,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com