linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1705302021090.31018@namei.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 20:22:57 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc:     keescook@...omium.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        casey@...aufler-ca.com, hch@...radead.org, igor.stoppa@...wei.com,
        james.l.morris@...cle.com, paul@...l-moore.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of
 struct list_head

On Sun, 28 May 2017, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

> can afford enabling". And we know that we cannot merge all security modules
> into mainline. Thus, allowing LKM-based LSM modules is inevitable.

Nope, it's not inevitable.  The LSM API only caters to in-tree users.

I'm not sure why you persist against this.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>