[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1496145961.3841.537.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:06:01 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ima-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] keys, trusted: modify
arguments of tpm_pcr_extend()
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 09:36 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 5/30/2017 5:35 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 16:21 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >> pcrlock() has been modified to pass the correct arguments
> >> to tpm_pcr_extend(): the pointer of a tpm2_digest structure containing
> >> a random value generated by tpm_get_random() and the size of the array (1).
> >
> > If the number of arguments is wrong, that means the patch that
> > introduced the change is not bi-sect safe. (This comment is
> > applicable to patch 5/5 too.)
>
> Jarkko (the TPM driver maintainer) asked me to not introduce
> a new function to pass multiple digests, but to modify
> the parameters of tpm_pcr_extend().
Since struct tpm2_digest is a static size, shouldn't we be able to
compute the number of digests?
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists