linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: fix blink counter register selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877f0yv6qa.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 15:01:33 +0200
From:   Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mvebu: fix blink counter register selection

Hi Richard,
 
 On mar., mai 30 2017, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:

> The blink counter A was always selected because 0 was forced in the
> blink select counter register.
> The variable 'set' was obviously there to be used as the register value,
> selecting the B counter when id==1 and A counter when id==0.
>
> Tested on clearfog-pro (Marvell 88F6828)
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>

Looks good for me:

Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>

I thinks this one should go to v4.12-rc as it is a fix.

As I modified the same part of the code in my series, I think I will
have to rebase my series on top of this patch as soon as Linus Walleij
will have accepted it.

Thanks,

Gregory


> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> index 19a92efabbef..cdef2c78cb3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
> @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		set = U32_MAX;
>  	else
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	writel_relaxed(0, mvebu_gpioreg_blink_counter_select(mvchip));
> +	writel_relaxed(set, mvebu_gpioreg_blink_counter_select(mvchip));
>  
>  	mvpwm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mvebu_pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!mvpwm)

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com