linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH] imx: serial: Take tty->files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 15:44:27 +0200
From:   Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
To:     Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] imx: serial: Take tty->files_lock opportunistically

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:42:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

I sent a second patch recently:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9725625/

> > > Fixes: 18a4208826dd0a13eb06de724c86bba2c225f943 ("imx-serial: Reduce
> > > RX DMA startup latency when opening for reading")
> > >
> > > Cc: cphealy@...il.com
> > > Cc: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Not sure if this is the best way to solve the problem (hence the RFC
> > > tag). If anyone has a better idea, or if there's a better fix for this
> > > already, please let me know.  
> > 
> > IMO, the low level serial drivers shouldn't be accessing
> > tty->tty_files in the first place. Is being opened for write-only that
> > common and is skipping the DMA setup really necessary?
> 
> Seconded - the Reduce RX DMA startup latency patch should just be
> reverted (and shouldn't ever IMHO have gotten in).
> 
> Not all readers and writers to a tty have a file handle any more anyway,
> so it's not only icky and layer violating it's fundamentally broken
> beyond the locking.
> 
> Alan