linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada 7K/8K

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170530162801.282302f1@free-electrons.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 16:28:01 +0200
From:   Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>,
        Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: marvell: enable GICP and ICU on Armada
 7K/8K

Hello,

On Tue, 30 May 2017 15:02:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:

> > @@ -221,13 +229,13 @@
> >  			cps_crypto: crypto@...000 {
> >  				compatible = "inside-secure,safexcel-eip197";
> >  				reg = <0x800000 0x200000>;
> > -				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 34 (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> > +				interrupts = <ICU_GRP_NSR 87 (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> >  				| IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,  
> 
> I've already mentioned this in a separate thread to Antoine, but it'd be
> good to fix this non-sensical configuration.

Antoine has already submitted a patch, and it has been merged by
Grégory already [1]. I simply didn't base my patches on top of the
latest patch from Antoine, but Grégory will handle the merge conflict
when applying the DT changes.

Thanks!

Thomas

[1] http://git.infradead.org/linux-mvebu.git/commitdiff/44f73dc42c11398d7b84e94365a485ebd6420798
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com