linux-kernel - Re: [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ae992f21-3edf-1ae7-41db-641052e411c7@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 13:16:50 -0400
From:   Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [v3 0/9] parallelized "struct page" zeroing

> Could you be more specific? E.g. how are other stores done in
> __init_single_page safe then? I am sorry to be dense here but how does
> the full 64B store differ from other stores done in the same function.

Hi Michal,

It is safe to do regular 8-byte and smaller stores (stx, st, sth, stb) 
without membar, but they are slower compared to STBI which require a 
membar before memory can be accessed. So when on SPARC we zero a larger 
span of memory it is faster to use STBI, and do one membar at the end. 
This is why for single thread it is faster to zero multiple pages of 
memory and than initialize only fields that are needed in "struct page". 
I believe the same is true for ppc64, as they clear the whole cacheline 
128-bytes at a time with larger memsets.

Pasha