linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: ignore type when setting segment registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 11:03:59 -0700
From:   Matt Mullins <mmullins@...x.us>
To:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>
Cc:     andre.przywara@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: ignore type when setting segment registers

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:54:21PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-05-29 15:24+0200, Gioh Kim:
> > If so, why type is checked when setting segment registers?
> 
> No idea.  19bca6ab75d8 ("KVM: SVM: Fix cross vendor migration issue with
> unusable bit") also moved the assigment up to initialize it before use
> and I think that is enough.

Was this perhaps intended to instead check for a zero selector, which is also
an unusable segment?