linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/6] mm: memcontrol: use the node-native slab memory counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 May 2017 14:17:21 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] mm: memcontrol: use the node-native slab memory counters

Now that the slab counters are moved from the zone to the node level
we can drop the private memcg node stats and use the official ones.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 --
 mm/memcontrol.c            | 8 ++++----
 mm/slab.h                  | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 899949bbb2f9..7b8f0f239fd6 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -44,8 +44,6 @@ enum memcg_stat_item {
 	MEMCG_SOCK,
 	/* XXX: why are these zone and not node counters? */
 	MEMCG_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
-	MEMCG_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE,
-	MEMCG_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
 	MEMCG_NR_STAT,
 };
 
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 94172089f52f..9c68a40c83e3 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5197,8 +5197,8 @@ static int memory_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	seq_printf(m, "kernel_stack %llu\n",
 		   (u64)stat[MEMCG_KERNEL_STACK_KB] * 1024);
 	seq_printf(m, "slab %llu\n",
-		   (u64)(stat[MEMCG_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE] +
-			 stat[MEMCG_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE]) * PAGE_SIZE);
+		   (u64)(stat[NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE] +
+			 stat[NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE]) * PAGE_SIZE);
 	seq_printf(m, "sock %llu\n",
 		   (u64)stat[MEMCG_SOCK] * PAGE_SIZE);
 
@@ -5222,9 +5222,9 @@ static int memory_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	}
 
 	seq_printf(m, "slab_reclaimable %llu\n",
-		   (u64)stat[MEMCG_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE] * PAGE_SIZE);
+		   (u64)stat[NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE] * PAGE_SIZE);
 	seq_printf(m, "slab_unreclaimable %llu\n",
-		   (u64)stat[MEMCG_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE] * PAGE_SIZE);
+		   (u64)stat[NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE] * PAGE_SIZE);
 
 	/* Accumulated memory events */
 
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 9cfcf099709c..69f0579cb5aa 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static __always_inline int memcg_charge_slab(struct page *page,
 
 	memcg_kmem_update_page_stat(page,
 			(s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
-			MEMCG_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : MEMCG_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
+			NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
 			1 << order);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static __always_inline void memcg_uncharge_slab(struct page *page, int order,
 
 	memcg_kmem_update_page_stat(page,
 			(s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
-			MEMCG_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : MEMCG_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
+			NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
 			-(1 << order));
 	memcg_kmem_uncharge(page, order);
 }
-- 
2.12.2