[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE2F3rDBw18zOnJBOD=+_okAiYy=BboPuuUPRjFT+4NKA_+DMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:42:31 -0700
From: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> + u64 nsecps;
>
> What does the 'ps' postfix stand for? It's not obvious (to me).
>
I guess that nsecps stands for "nanoseconds per second", although the
code appears to be storing that value left shifted by
tk->tkr_raw.shift.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists