[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwkTrfUX6_Dyh0ucdc=p9RsS+AJk6GpJaice_HNpuRQgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:42:35 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>
Subject: Re: Yes, people use FOLL_FORCE ;)
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
>> But it sounds like your JIT case actually uses it for writing -
>> but if you can write a small blurb about it, that would be nice.
>
> yes, we use it for writing. Happy to describe the scheme in more detail.
Ok, I've effectively undone that commit (not as a revert, but
semantically we should be back to 4.11 behavior).
I added in some of your comments in the commit message, so hopefully
we'll have a log of why that FOLL_FORCE is there.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists