[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbxW7sRqNpkPCRFascE5-hJtyKAhZVK4s1Qq9=aM-k49Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 02:01:19 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 14:39, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Should I merge them all? Should Greg merge them all?
>> Should one of us produce an immutable branch?
>
> Half of the patch are affecting both serial and GPIO subsystem, most
> have GPIO focus, though. Just patch 10 or more serial than GPIO. All in
> all, maybe Greg can ack and things can flow through the GPIO tree?
OK with me, let's see what Greg says.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists