[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1496218729-17992-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@163.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 16:18:49 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
To: oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
jsimmons@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
bobijam.xu@...el.com, dmitry.eremin@...el.com
Cc: lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] libcfs: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in cfs_percpt_lock and cfs_percpt_unlock
The driver may sleep under a spin lock, and the function call path is:
cfs_percpt_lock/cfs_percpt_unlock (acquire the lock by spin_lock)
LASSERT
lbug_with_loc
libcfs_debug_dumplog
schedule and kthread_run --> may sleep
To fix it, all "LASSERT" is placed out of the spin_lock and spin_unlock.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/libcfs_lock.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/libcfs_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/libcfs_lock.c
index 1967b97c..a2ce092f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/libcfs_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/libcfs_lock.c
@@ -113,9 +113,10 @@ struct cfs_percpt_lock *
/* exclusive lock request */
for (i = 0; i < ncpt; i++) {
+ if (!i)
+ LASSERT(!pcl->pcl_locked);
spin_lock(pcl->pcl_locks[i]);
if (!i) {
- LASSERT(!pcl->pcl_locked);
/* nobody should take private lock after this
* so I wouldn't starve for too long time
*/
@@ -141,11 +142,11 @@ struct cfs_percpt_lock *
}
for (i = ncpt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- if (!i) {
- LASSERT(pcl->pcl_locked);
+ if (!i)
pcl->pcl_locked = 0;
- }
spin_unlock(pcl->pcl_locks[i]);
+ if (!i)
+ LASSERT(pcl->pcl_locked);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfs_percpt_unlock);
--
1.7.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists