[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531092544.rdhcmilywb5o6nay@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:25:44 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RTC: rtc-cmos: Fix wakeup from suspend-to-idle
On 31/05/2017 at 11:21:55 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 14/05/2017 at 01:55:32 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Commit eed4d47efe95 (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from
> > suspend-to-idle) modified the core suspend-to-idle code to filter
> > out spurious SCI interrupts received while suspended, which requires
> > ACPI event source handlers to report wakeup events in a way that
> > will trigger a wakeup from suspend to idle (or abort system suspends
> > in progress, which is equivalent).
> >
> > That needs to be done in the rtc-cmos driver too, which was overlooked
> > by the above commit, so do that now.
> >
> > Fixes: eed4d47efe95 (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle)
> > Reported-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> > @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ static u32 rtc_handler(void *context)
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
> >
> > - pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
> > + pm_wakeup_hard_event(dev);
> > acpi_clear_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC);
> > acpi_disable_event(ACPI_EVENT_RTC, 0);
> > return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED;
> >
>
> This seems good to me, do you expect it to go through my tree?
>
OK, I see it has already been pulled by Linus.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists