linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] nvmet: add uuid field to nvme

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170531094531.GB10718@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 11:45:31 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] nvmet: add uuid field to nvme_ns and populate via
        configfs

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:48:09AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 11:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This should be stored as a uuid_t (or rather uuid_be in the current
> > kernel, but I'm about to rename it), and use uuid_be_to_bin / uuid_to_bin
> > for parsing.
> 
> OK, thought you ask me to do that. Which one do you prefer?

I think you'll have to use the old names, unless we get the uuid
changes stabilized soon and can pull the branch for it into the
nvme / block tree.  So go with those for now, and I'll do any
after the fact cleanup later.