linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1705312102560.8015@namei.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 21:04:30 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc:     gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        casey@...aufler-ca.com, hch@...radead.org, igor.stoppa@...wei.com,
        james.l.morris@...cle.com, paul@...l-moore.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of
 struct list_head

On Wed, 31 May 2017, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

> via lack of ability to use LKM-based LSM modules). My customers cannot afford
> enabling SELinux, but my customers cannot rebuild their kernels because
> rebuilding makes it even more difficult to get help from support centers.
> Therefore, my customers remain unable to use LSM modules which they want.
> This is really unfortunate for me.

And they'll be able to get vendor support when they have their own custom 
LSMs installed?  


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>